Oy...this is deteriorating quickly.
I think it's safe to say that one has to be careful assuming that what the media says about science is ever supported by refereed scientific literature. It's easy for news outlets to sensationalize one not yet reproduced study that showed a chemical
might be unsafe, but it's altogether harder for one news article to overturn the prevailing belief that fluoride is not only safe, but beneficial.
The next time you undergo anesthesia for a life-saving surgery, you might want to take pause and think about how anesthesia is essentially controlled poisoning with toxins to put you in a sleep state. We have to be careful any time we assume things are necessarily toxic: after all, anything is lethal in the right dose--yes, that's right, even oxygen and water.
The reality is, I could probably find 20 scientific articles out of respected dentistry journals to support fluoride's benefit. Everything is a risk/reward tradeoff, and I'd argue that the minuscule amounts of fluoride in tap water and toothpaste have far less risk than reward.
I think you'd be surprised to know just how many compounds, especially pharmaceuticals, contain fluorine. In fact, most inhaled anesthetic gases DO contain it!
My point isn't to troll but to provide a well-reasoned argument not necessarily in favor of fluoride in toothpaste (because frankly if you don't want to use it, I don't care). My objective is primarily to express my disapproval of relying on Yahoo news for relevant health tips backed by shoddy "science."
All of that being said, everyone has a right to their own opinion. My goal isn't to change yours, but to give you some food for thought with regards to the opposing argument.
I've included some references for your consideration. They come from reputable sources from within the medical community:
High-fluoride toothpaste: a mu... [Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014] - PubMed - NCBI
ADA clinical recommendations on topical fluo... [Evid Based Dent. 2014] - PubMed - NCBI