What's new

President Trump

@Fasttrak Can you please explain the Clinton Fundation.

Supposedly a foundation that raises money in the name of the needy. They have done some good in Africa and other places the trouble is, it is run by people who have spent most of their lives in public service at the highest levels of government. Many, my self included, find this arrangement is not in the best interest of the people as it offers far too great an incentive of misusing said political affiliations and positions of power in a pay-to-play scenario. Though their foundation has received passing grades from watch dog groups there have also been claims of pressure from the foundation to those same groups to give passing grades.

There is plenty of information out there on why this scenario is not in the best interest of the public to have politicians out pandering to foreign interests and receiving monies from them. It is the kind of situation most attorneys would call a conflict of interest. If you start researching the kinds of people they take money from it makes you wonder why those folks would bother to give to the Clinton Foundation when they surely have needs in their own communities.

The foundation is only one of the things that stinks about the Clinton's, the fact they have been going around the globe and giving talks to foreign interests and collecting massive fees since the early nineties is the thing I find most galling. Some have put their earnings at just the speaking fees at nearly 154 million since the early nineties. You have to wonder why these folks would spend from $400,000.00 to $900,000.00 to sit down and talk with either of the Clinton's.
 
Supposedly a foundation that raises money in the name of the needy. They have done some good in Africa and other places the trouble is, it is run by people who have spent most of their lives in public service at the highest levels of government. Many, my self included, find this arrangement is not in the best interest of the people as it offers far too great an incentive of misusing said political affiliations and positions of power in a pay-to-play scenario. Though their foundation has received passing grades from watch dog groups there have also been claims of pressure from the foundation to those same groups to give passing grades.

There is plenty of information out there on why this scenario is not in the best interest of the public to have politicians out pandering to foreign interests and receiving monies from them. It is the kind of situation most attorneys would call a conflict of interest. If you start researching the kinds of people they take money from it makes you wonder why those folks would bother to give to the Clinton Foundation when they surely have needs in their own communities.

The foundation is only one of the things that stinks about the Clinton's, the fact they have been going around the globe and giving talks to foreign interests and collecting massive fees since the early nineties is the thing I find most galling. Some have put their earnings at just the speaking fees at nearly 154 million since the early nineties. You have to wonder why these folks would spend from $400,000.00 to $900,000.00 to sit down and talk with either of the Clinton's.
Well, Bill's speech might finish with a happy ending, but that's gotta be worth about $50. :p
 
Well, Bill's speech might finish with a happy ending, but that's gotta be worth about $50. :p


As much as you saw HRC crying her eyes out after the election of Donald Trump, Bill was on the sidelines crying his own blues over the loss of massive speaking fees lost over the next four years.
 
@Fasttrak Thank you sire! I read somewhere 'people' with financial-interests dipped into the 'Fund'ation. I can't verify the source. I was not there, and I did not see it meself.
 
doob.jpg
 
Top